Part 1 of this topic touched upon the reasons why sexual
contact between therapist and patient is harmful, and covered the standards in
the Code of Ethics
that dictate proper sexual behavior between therapist and patient.
There are additional guidelines for sexual contact with
colleagues:
The Code prohibits sexual contact with a colleague who is
your supervisee, student, trainee, or anyone else over whom you have authority
(standard 2.07[a]).
It’s advised against having a sexual relationship with other
colleagues if there is any potential for conflict of interest (standard
2.07[b]).
Sexual harassment between colleagues is also prohibited
(standard 2.08).
How should you go about answering exam questions about
sexual content?
If there is a question on the exam about you as the
therapist having romantic or sexual feelings for a client, obviously
don’t select answers that involve you acting on your feelings.
However, the correct answer usually isn’t to terminate
immediately, either. You can’t
realistically terminate everyone to whom you feel attraction.
Sometimes the best answer on the test includes talking about
the sexual/romantic attraction with the client. However, the “best-best” answer usually involves seeking
consultation with a colleague to process your feelings.
Specifically for California test-takers, if you learn
someone has previously had a sexual relationship with their therapist, you
should give them the booklet entitled Professional Therapy Never Includes Sex.
Also important to note -- If you learn that a minor client
has had sexual contact with their therapist, that is a mandated report of child abuse.
The booklet states that “A national study revealed that
probably fewer than 10 percent of all therapists have had sexual contact with
their patients,” though it does not give a citation for that study. Anyone know it?
Regardless, any number of therapists having sexual contact
with clients is too many, and up to 10% is an astonishingly large number. So although this topic may seem
obvious, it bears reminding – don’t do it!
No comments:
Post a Comment