You are working with an inpatient cancer patient who tells you he is
interested in ceasing aggressive medical treatment and starting palliative
care. You’ve had experience with
patients dying and also with those who choose to end treatment. However, in your opinion, he is considering
hospice earlier than most other patients usually do, when his chance of
survivorship is quite high, and it “feels wrong” to you.
Think of similar situations where you feel conflicted, or outright may
not agree, with a client’s desires or actions—a pregnant woman who is
considering different plans of parenting, adoption, or abortion. A domestic violence survivor going back
to the abusive partner to give him/her another shot. A graduate student who tells you about some dishonest paper
writing or exam cheating.
Social workers encounter plenty of circumstances with
clients that raise personal issues for themselves. In those, it can be hard (but even more important) to stay
professional and recall the ethical guidelines.
The NASW Code of Ethics says explicitly (emphasis my own): “Social workers respect and promote the right of clients to self-determination and assist
clients in their efforts to identify
and clarify their goals.” This is
section 1.02, Self-Determination.
Sometimes it seems like a client’s own decision will result in a
chance of harm coming to themselves or others, and we know that promoting a
client’s wellbeing is another important part of the code of ethics (section
1.01).
But when can you limit
clients’ own decisions? The
following sentence in the self-determination section of the code states: “Social
workers may limit clients' right to self-determination when, in the social
workers' professional judgment, clients' actions or potential actions pose a serious, foreseeable, and imminent
risk to themselves or others.” Those qualifiers need to be present
in order for a social worker to step in.
Thus:
In real life counseling as well as on the ASWB exam (and
California Law & Ethics exam), right/best answers in the self-determination
category might look like 1) you helping clients explore the pros and cons of
various paths, 2) assisting them in making a decision for themselves, and 3) generally respecting their own decisions –
excepting issues involving mandated reporting, duty to warn, suicidal ideation with a plan &
means to a plan, etc.
Good luck
studying!